Your trusted local news source since 1910
Cascade Public Schools has long offered an after-school program (formerly known as the XCELL program) to provide students with a safe, engaging space to learn and socialize until their guardians pick them up. This program has served the community for years in various forms, becoming a valued resource for both students and parents.
However, the program now faces an uncertain future due to funding challenges. Historically, the program was supported by Montana’s Office of Public Instruction (OPI) through the STEM 21st Century Grant. This funding allowed students to explore science, technology, and math in a hands-on environment, fostering critical thinking and academic growth. Unfortunately, the grant ended, leaving the program entirely subsidized by an elementary levy received by the school.
The situation reached a critical point earlier this year when the school board decided that, without new funding by December 2024, the program would be discontinued. Now, a proposal to extend the program through the end of the 2024-2025 school year has been referred to the finance committee for further review. This decision will ultimately shape the program's future—and potentially impact the families it serves.
The after-school program is more than an extracurricular activity; for many parents, it’s a lifeline. With most families relying on dual incomes or single parents working full-time, after-school care fills a critical gap. Many parents commute to Great Falls or Helena, leaving their children to either take the bus or walk home in often-frigid Montana winters. Without the program, these students could be left unsupervised for hours—a significant safety concern.
Even without grant funding, the program has continued to provide value. Students are still engaging in science, reading, and other educational activities, supported by dedicated staff. For parents, the program represents more than convenience; it offers peace of mind.
Yet, the financial strain on Cascade Public Schools cannot be ignored. Critics argue that the district cannot justify funding the program at the expense of other priorities. At the recent board meeting held on November 19, one member described it as "an after-school babysitting program" and questioned whether it’s the school’s responsibility to provide such a service.
As the finance committee evaluates the program's future, the community must grapple with tough questions: Should the program continue despite the financial burden on the school? Or should the responsibility for after-school care fall to families or external organizations?
This journalist presents these arguments to inform readers and encourage thoughtful consideration. The decision will impact students, parents, and the broader Cascade community. Where do you stand?
Reader Comments(0)